The new trend is not just a faction of the DPP, there are also "southern stream" and "north stream". Generally speaking, Nanliu is a local type, and Beiliu is a scholar type. Beiliu is a "master of Taiwan independence theory" like Lin Zhuoshui, and Nanliu is a "pragmatic Taiwan independence worker" like Lai Qingde. The word "Taiwan independence" is one of the main cards for the DPP to gather supporters. Corresponding to the north-south flow of the new trend, there are also obvious differences between "theory" (idealism) and "pragmatism" (instrumentalism). difference. For example, Qiu Yiren, a new trend leader and former secretary-general of the National Security Council, talked about the issue of Taiwan independence when he participated in an online seminar at Georgetown University in the United States in 2020. He said at the time that "Taiwan's 'pragmatic' politicians will not do this unless they are crazy. Even the former President Chen Shui-bian will step on the brakes in the end." Qiu Yiren also mentioned in his conversation with Chen Shui-bian on July 4, 2021 that Taiwan's decision to declare independence is not made by the people of Taiwan. It sounds cruel, but it is the reality , we must take into account the international situation and China's possible actions. Qiu Yiren further emphasized that, needless to say, China will attack Taiwan.
As far as he knows, the United States simply does not approve of it. As a legally independent country, Taiwan is no longer something that the people of Taiwan can do, so he needs to make a special explanation. At that time, Chen Shui-bian also echoed Qiu Yiren's statement, saying that he had proposed an amendment to the DPP's regular meeting in 1991, and believed that the more correct statement of the Taiwan Independence Party Program was "the self-determination of the residents". As for "the idea of establishing a sovereign and independent Republic of Taiwan and formulating a new constitution based on the principle of national sovereignty, it should be wedding photo retouching services decided by all Taiwan residents through a referendum," because "in practice, there are many concerns." The dispute over the line within the new trend is more like how the two organizations view "promoting Taiwan independence" Lai Qingde calls himself a "pragmatic worker for Taiwan independence". On December 29, 2021, when he attended the "Jewish-Taiwan Cultural Exchange Association and the Opening Ceremony of the Jewish Community Center", he mentioned that he had met Benjamin Netanyahu, then Prime Minister of Israel. , asked him how to solve the "neighbor" problem, which gave him a lot of inspiration. At that time,
Netanyahu said to Lai Chingde: "Israel does not believe that peace can be ensured through a paper agreement behind closed doors. Peace can be achieved through long-term cooperation between the two peoples. Therefore, Israel helps Egypt, Jordan, and Syria develop agriculture, and is also helping Egypt, Jordan, and Syria to develop agriculture. Assist neighboring countries in cyber security. Only through long-term cooperation, mutual understanding and mutual trust can such peace be guaranteed.” Lai emphasized that if peace is desired in the Middle East or on both sides of the Strait, there may be similarities in this spirit. Earlier, on May 21, 2019, Lai Qingde accepted an exclusive interview with CommonWealth Magazine, saying that his "pragmatic Taiwan independence" was mainly based on the "Taiwan Future Resolution", which has three main points: Taiwan is already a sovereign and independent country called the Republic of China, and the ruling will not declare independence in addition. The future of Taiwan is determined by 23 million people. The current job is to develop economic construction and benefit the people of the country. Lai Qingde then pointed out that the meaning behind "Taiwan independence" is to defend sovereignty, oppose annexation, and protect democracy. If the word "Taiwan independence" is always stigmatized, it might be better to use "Taiwan lord" instead, that is, "Taiwan sovereignty, Taiwan democracy". Comparing Lai Qingde's line, not only within the new trend, but